Monday, February 11, 2013

Why Kenya’s first presidential debate won’t change the voter’s minds

Kenya is set to have its first televised presidential debate in a race that has attracted a total of eight candidates – one woman and 7 men - all gunning for the top seat that will see the winner taking over a county government system for the first time in our country’s history.  The candidates are expected to discuss various issues of national interest including the economy, health, security and employment among many others.  Among the candidates in the race is the son of the founding father of Kenya Mzee Jomo Kenyatta who is facing charges of crimes against humanity at the international criminal court at The Hague. Others include the Prime Minister Raila Odinga, Martha Karua, Peter Kenneth, Musalia Mudavadi, Prof. James Ole Kiyapi, Paul Muite and Mohammed Abduba. This election comes as Kenya marks its 50th anniversary as an independent state with many Kenyans pinning their hopes on the outcome of the polls considering the events of the last disputed election which led cases of violence.
Many people however, have their misgivings regarding the impact of this debate considering the events leading up to it, where top leaders of various political parties have been whipping up tribal sentiments while forming coalitions based on tribal numbers as opposed to issues that affect the common man on the street.
The presidential debates the world over, are meant to expose the voters to the people who want to represent them as leaders. They present them with a perfect chance to interrogate their policies and plans for the country and clarify issues of public interest. In the US for instance, whose presidential debates generate interest beyond their borders, leaders from all the parties including the republicans, democrats, liberals and conservatives are put to task concerning key issues affecting Americans  like immigration, economy, job creation, public health, gay and minority rights  and international policy among many others. While all these parties have an unshakable traditional stand and approach on these issues, the debates help especially the so called undecided voters and swing states to decide on whom to vote for. Republicans are traditionally known for their emphasis on national security and a firm stand on immigration laws whereas the democrats believe in scaling down the military and the federal budget on intelligence while preferring a diplomatic approach with foreign nations in tackling insecurity.  
In Kenya, the situation is quite different. First of all our political parties were and still are based on ethnic alliances and convenience as opposed to a lasting value system capable of outliving generations of leaders. Since the days of single party and multi-party democracy, the ruling party has been galvanizing support from various ethnic groups which also reflected appointments to key government post as a reward to loyalists and sycophants. This situation bred cartels within the government who oversaw massive graft and embezzlement of public funds and resources. Communities that didn't a have “one of their own” in the government were marginalized and left behind as far as development is concerned. This situation therefore forced them to coalesce around an ethnic agenda in order to have a piece of the pie. This led to enmity among various communities who felt treated unjustifiably as resources were skewly distributed. People therefore chose to stick with one of their own for survival. This has colored the way we interact and certainly the way we choose our leaders during elections. The sad thing is that young people who are supposed to represent the future and therefore hope for this nation, are also corrupted to the core if sentiments and posts on the various social media platforms are anything to by. The hope of the nation is erroneously said to lie with the middle class who represent the swing vote but the problem is that they are too comfortable to give a hoot. This debate will therefore be reduced to something akin to a football match where supporters from either side cheer on their team as opposed to a job interview that will give us the best man or woman for the greatest job of leading our nation to a promising future. I remain optimistic.