As i was writing this post i couldn't help but reminisce at how my father used to be treated as a king in our house back in the days. His word was the law and everybody had to observe and obey it to the latter or else face his wrath. This has been the case in many households especially in the African context governed by strict traditions where the place and position of a man in the society was highly esteemed. Whilst some people would say this ensured discipline in the house and the society at large in terms of leadership, it also had some aspects of dictatorship which were repugnant since they stifled what i'd call family democracy.
This strong hand of the African man extended as far as his resources stretched. This therefore meant that before any decision was made, the man had to be consulted or else nothing would be done at best or hell would break loose at worst.
Traditionally(and presently as well), African men were not only the custodians of the family names but they also protected all the assets and properties belonging to the family in order to ensure they were effectively passed on from one generation to the next.
The work of the woman therefore has traditionally been reduced to that of a servant whose work is to generate wealth for her family yet she still lacks the powers to make any critical decision regarding the use of the land. Since the husband buys everything including the small radio at home and all electronic gadgets(being also in control of the finances), he gets to decide which channels people would listen to on radio or watch in case they have a Tv set. The only family bank account-if any- is controlled by him which therefore means that he gets to enjoy end of the year bonuses that accrue from the sale of coffee and other commodities yet chances are that he was merely a spectator when the wife and children were toiling.
Most traditional men would probably listen to the old classical music while women would probably prefer listening to something different. This therefore means, in case there is an educative program running on Tv or radio, the family would definitely miss out on the information being put across since the only channel of communication is jealously controlled. This reminds the old days when the only person allowed to as much as touch the family radio was the father.
Cultural believes and attitudes could also play a significant role in determining the receptivity and adaptability of technology among some communities. To some people within the social structure- especially the elders, technology is perceived as an invasion to their privacy or worse still, a form of corruption into their culture which would spoil the future generations by filling their impressionable minds with foreign ideologies and lifestyle which are at cross purposes with the local culture and norms. Although this is slowly changing in many parts of the world due to the use of the media and other campaigns which have helped in exposing the hitherto very cultural people to different cultures, there still exists a good number of people who would have none of this at least for now.
Property and asset control has also been a stumbling block towards full utilization of technology. Traditionally, men being custodians of the resources like land and the title deeds attached to them, their decisions are final regarding what is to be done or the investments to be put on a given farm. This therefore has the negative impact of sidelining women leaving them disenfranchised as it were. This eventually affects the whole family because as much as they lack ownership rights and therefore they don't have a say, they play a significant role in the management of the farm and as such their input cannot be gainsaid. There's therefore a need to bring their issues to the fore by making sure that they are treated as partners especially during the decision making process regarding investments into the farm. Since most of them spend much of their time toiling for the family, they understand better the general trends and status of the farm in terms of the improvements and viable investments that need to be done. Using them as conduits towards the adaption of technology especially among smallholder farmers has a great promise. Most of them by virtue of being social by nature, would probably be more receptive towards the adoption and application of a given technology than their male counterparts.
Societies still clinging to their cultures while condemning modern technology should know that tradition and science can co-exist very well without one compromising the other. The world is changing so fast owing to globalization and issues like global warming and global economic recessions that are affecting all and sundry. This therefore calls for a concerted effort from all quarters in dealing with these issues irrespective of our cultural differences. This can only be achieved in a networked environment with the help of technology and other deliberate efforts like government policies which would help people link up in order to share knowledge and experiences thereby tackling problems that bedevil man in the 21st Century like disease, hunger and food insecurity. These are the same simple steps that would see us achieve the millennium development goals that we all strive for before the 2015 deadline.
This strong hand of the African man extended as far as his resources stretched. This therefore meant that before any decision was made, the man had to be consulted or else nothing would be done at best or hell would break loose at worst.
Traditionally(and presently as well), African men were not only the custodians of the family names but they also protected all the assets and properties belonging to the family in order to ensure they were effectively passed on from one generation to the next.
The work of the woman therefore has traditionally been reduced to that of a servant whose work is to generate wealth for her family yet she still lacks the powers to make any critical decision regarding the use of the land. Since the husband buys everything including the small radio at home and all electronic gadgets(being also in control of the finances), he gets to decide which channels people would listen to on radio or watch in case they have a Tv set. The only family bank account-if any- is controlled by him which therefore means that he gets to enjoy end of the year bonuses that accrue from the sale of coffee and other commodities yet chances are that he was merely a spectator when the wife and children were toiling.
Most traditional men would probably listen to the old classical music while women would probably prefer listening to something different. This therefore means, in case there is an educative program running on Tv or radio, the family would definitely miss out on the information being put across since the only channel of communication is jealously controlled. This reminds the old days when the only person allowed to as much as touch the family radio was the father.
Cultural believes and attitudes could also play a significant role in determining the receptivity and adaptability of technology among some communities. To some people within the social structure- especially the elders, technology is perceived as an invasion to their privacy or worse still, a form of corruption into their culture which would spoil the future generations by filling their impressionable minds with foreign ideologies and lifestyle which are at cross purposes with the local culture and norms. Although this is slowly changing in many parts of the world due to the use of the media and other campaigns which have helped in exposing the hitherto very cultural people to different cultures, there still exists a good number of people who would have none of this at least for now.
Property and asset control has also been a stumbling block towards full utilization of technology. Traditionally, men being custodians of the resources like land and the title deeds attached to them, their decisions are final regarding what is to be done or the investments to be put on a given farm. This therefore has the negative impact of sidelining women leaving them disenfranchised as it were. This eventually affects the whole family because as much as they lack ownership rights and therefore they don't have a say, they play a significant role in the management of the farm and as such their input cannot be gainsaid. There's therefore a need to bring their issues to the fore by making sure that they are treated as partners especially during the decision making process regarding investments into the farm. Since most of them spend much of their time toiling for the family, they understand better the general trends and status of the farm in terms of the improvements and viable investments that need to be done. Using them as conduits towards the adaption of technology especially among smallholder farmers has a great promise. Most of them by virtue of being social by nature, would probably be more receptive towards the adoption and application of a given technology than their male counterparts.
Societies still clinging to their cultures while condemning modern technology should know that tradition and science can co-exist very well without one compromising the other. The world is changing so fast owing to globalization and issues like global warming and global economic recessions that are affecting all and sundry. This therefore calls for a concerted effort from all quarters in dealing with these issues irrespective of our cultural differences. This can only be achieved in a networked environment with the help of technology and other deliberate efforts like government policies which would help people link up in order to share knowledge and experiences thereby tackling problems that bedevil man in the 21st Century like disease, hunger and food insecurity. These are the same simple steps that would see us achieve the millennium development goals that we all strive for before the 2015 deadline.