The issue of climate change has in the recent days gained a lot of public attention and generated an interesting debate among top scholars, governments, researchers and environmenlists alike. Much of the debate has revolved around the issue of adaptability and resilience in the face of climate change and its impacts especially among the countries predicted to be worst hit by climate change. This has seen the emergence of different arguments coming from both the proponents for and against climate change, with others questioning whether its real or just a propaganda gimmicks by the 'green' campaigners with the objective of 'forcing' and influencing behavioral change through the installation of fear and in the process subterfuge people. Those are the politics of climate change, but when all is said and done, governments and the proponents for or against the subject of climate change, ought to ask themselves indeed very serious and deep questions concerning our current state of affairs as far as the climate is concerned. A cursory look at the statistics from climate scientists, its obvious that the status quo has been shaken. The business as usual approach is no longer an attractive option going by the evidence of the changing climatic patterns. There are arguments from different scientists that, while areas mainly in Africa are likely to suffer in terms of prolonged droughts and flooding incidences, areas in Europe are expected to record a favorable weather patterns that would be considered a positive thing or a gain. On the flip side, sea levels are expected to rise by 18 and 59 centimeters by the end of the century in many parts of the world. Floods and prolonged droughts are a reality in many parts of Africa today with many farmers recording zero harvests or a delay in the onset of the rainfall sessions; lack of fresh drinking water and the spread of diseases like malaria are just but a few of the changes brought about by climate change.
A lot of these can be blamed largely on anthropogenic factors driven by man's ways of living. Many countries in their attempt to create jobs and boost their revenue base through exports in this hard economic times, have continued to emit a lot of greenhouse gases in to the atmosphere. The increase of the global population hasn't helped the situation either by exerting tremendous preassure on the finite resources like energy, water etc; Extravagant and less green lifestyles in the modern world has meant that many families are owning several vehicles, which translates to more gas consumption and therefore pollution in to the atmosphere.
Several solutions have been mooted in an attempt to nip this global warming trend in the bud. The Kyoto protocol as a case in point-an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC)- sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As much as this is a loadable effort, the less developed and developing countries of the world, which are also making efforts to catch up with their European and western counterparts in industrialization and information technology, cannot be said to be that green. Emerging economic powerhouses as they are called, consisting of countries like India, Brazil and even South Africa are all in the race to joining the club of the big boys, so to speak, by marching their per capita incomes building state-of-the-art infrastructures.
Other efforts like the clean development mechanism(CDM) have been put in place to stimulate sustainable development and emission reductions. The mechanism allows emission-reduction projects in developing countries to earn certified reduction credits. (source: UNFCC)
Much of the aforementioned efforts are mainly scientific and technical in nature. Other less technical, yet effective approaches are yet to be explored fully.Most African countries and in deed others as well like Brazil and Australia and many others, have minority indigenous groups domiciled mainly in forested areas. Most of their lifestyles-largely traditional- could be considered arguably 100% green. Their livelihood completely hinges on the provisions of nature for their daily survival.
The forests are considered rich with different natural resources like herbs, traditional vegetables, honey(both ground and surface honey), water etc which form a crucial resource base for these communities.
Since the forests are their livelihoods, they tend to live a very disciplined lifestyle, where the use of resources is guided by certain principles. In one indigenous community in Kenya called the Ogiek(Mau Forest) and the Yiaaku(Mukogodo Forest), i got to learn quite a lot about their lifestyle during my research. They both have a system of governance-both social and in terms of resource utilization- that contributes to natural resources management. In both communities-who are more or less like relatives- trees and all the resources in it, play a crucial role in their day-to-day life. For instance, its prohibited to cut down a live tree among the Ogieks, for either making a bee hive or for firewood. Tradition dictates that only dead trees be used for such. Traditional herbs can only be harvested by a specialist, mostly considered to be the community doctor. Trees played a key role in their life such that it was believed that in the event that one cuts down a tree, they would invite curses not just for themselves only but also the generations to come. This therefore meant that people exercised utmost discipline in resource utilization. Trees also acted as shelters i.e as a house and also provided camouflage and a hiding place and a safe refuge when enemies attack and also during the rainy seasons.
Such a strict traditional governance system therefore ensured that much of the remnants of truly indigenous trees in Kenya were protected and this can be spotted in areas still occupied by the indigenous communities. Of late however, the situation is gradually changing partly as a result of politics that has seen the large-scale eviction of the indigenous communities from their ancestral lands in the name of creating conservation areas and also resettlement programs in an aim to rehabilitate the degraded lands. Instead, what has happened is that another door of corruption has been opened, where timber merchants obtain dubious licences for harvesting indigenous trees-mainly hardwood-considered to be of high quality. Huge blocks of forested areas covered by indigenous trees-which really take many years to mature-and also form catchment areas for many rivers and streams supplying water to urban centers around and far away have been cleared.
Efforts to replace the indigenous trees with exotic trees hasn't born much fruit since most of these exotics are not well adaptable to the surrounding environment. Further, the fact that many of them mature faster, means that we are trapped on a zero sum game with no significant increase in the forest cover. These trees are toxic in nature, restricting undergrowth which means they are not good for rehabilitating an ecosystem which hosts a variety of flora and fauna that are interdependent.
The government through international agencies like the World Bank, is slowly beginning to appreciate the role traditional ecological knowledge from the indigenous people can play in restoring the former glory of the hitherto destroyed forests. Quite a number of projects like the Natural Resource Management(NRM) by the World Bank through the Kenya Forest Service-a government arm in charge of managing all forests in Kenya- have been initiated and are required to incorporate indigenous people with ideas as key stakholders. This has led to the emergence of a partnership between the government and the people towards the protection of the forests considered by climate scientists as carbon sinks capable of storing carbon for many years thus ridding the ozone of harmful GHC gases. This therefore means that the indigenous communities will be allowed to access the forest to extract essential resources for their livelihood like honey, herbal plants, vegetables and dry firewood among many others, while at the same time helping the government in rehabilitating and managing the forests by planting more indigenous trees; Equally important. they'll be key participants on issues of policing efforts to guard against illegal logging and extraction of forest products. The other areas of corporation is in the implementation of the REDD+(plus)(Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) mechanism by the UN. This is aimed at creating a financial value for the carbon stored in the forests, as an incentive for developing countries to adopt green strategies by investing in low-carbon development paths for sustainable development. This is where the role of conservation and sustainable management of forests comes in. Its envisaged that the financial flow for greenhouse gas emission reduction from REDD+ could reach up to 30billion US dollars a year, which forms a good revenue base that could be used to boost pro-poor development initiatives.In order to achieve these set goals, the UN has recognized the role of the indigenous groups and has set up mechanisms that will ensure that their rights are secured in the REDD+ implantation as key stakeholders. In fact, World Bank has incorporated in its terms of reference concerning projects under their funding with indigenous communities, a clause on FPIC(Free Prior and Informed Consultation) which basically means that, before any project under its funding is implemented, the people in that area-who are key stakeholders- ought to be consulted in advance and supplied with full information concerning the pros and cons of the project.
Indigenous communities and indigenous knowledge has therefore come to play a very central role in the efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change and global warming. To this far, challenges still abound both from internal and external sources with the former mainly emanating from the government while the latter is mainly due to a change in lifestyle and modernization among people, which means that people have been forced to adopt modern lifestyles hence abandoning their traditional social and economic systems of living for modern and "fancy" ones which are capitalistic in nature. This has therefore broken that critical societal fabric guided by customs and traditions governance system, meaning that people begin to live individual lives and start demanding modern sources of energy and foodstuffs etc which require money to sustain them. This has forced many to turn to forest and its products for sustenance. The result has been and sadly so that, people who ought to protect these forests, have turned in to loggers themselves all in an attempt to eke out a living.
A lot of these can be blamed largely on anthropogenic factors driven by man's ways of living. Many countries in their attempt to create jobs and boost their revenue base through exports in this hard economic times, have continued to emit a lot of greenhouse gases in to the atmosphere. The increase of the global population hasn't helped the situation either by exerting tremendous preassure on the finite resources like energy, water etc; Extravagant and less green lifestyles in the modern world has meant that many families are owning several vehicles, which translates to more gas consumption and therefore pollution in to the atmosphere.
Several solutions have been mooted in an attempt to nip this global warming trend in the bud. The Kyoto protocol as a case in point-an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC)- sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As much as this is a loadable effort, the less developed and developing countries of the world, which are also making efforts to catch up with their European and western counterparts in industrialization and information technology, cannot be said to be that green. Emerging economic powerhouses as they are called, consisting of countries like India, Brazil and even South Africa are all in the race to joining the club of the big boys, so to speak, by marching their per capita incomes building state-of-the-art infrastructures.
Other efforts like the clean development mechanism(CDM) have been put in place to stimulate sustainable development and emission reductions. The mechanism allows emission-reduction projects in developing countries to earn certified reduction credits. (source: UNFCC)
Much of the aforementioned efforts are mainly scientific and technical in nature. Other less technical, yet effective approaches are yet to be explored fully.Most African countries and in deed others as well like Brazil and Australia and many others, have minority indigenous groups domiciled mainly in forested areas. Most of their lifestyles-largely traditional- could be considered arguably 100% green. Their livelihood completely hinges on the provisions of nature for their daily survival.
A traditional beehive made from a dead log. |
Since the forests are their livelihoods, they tend to live a very disciplined lifestyle, where the use of resources is guided by certain principles. In one indigenous community in Kenya called the Ogiek(Mau Forest) and the Yiaaku(Mukogodo Forest), i got to learn quite a lot about their lifestyle during my research. They both have a system of governance-both social and in terms of resource utilization- that contributes to natural resources management. In both communities-who are more or less like relatives- trees and all the resources in it, play a crucial role in their day-to-day life. For instance, its prohibited to cut down a live tree among the Ogieks, for either making a bee hive or for firewood. Tradition dictates that only dead trees be used for such. Traditional herbs can only be harvested by a specialist, mostly considered to be the community doctor. Trees played a key role in their life such that it was believed that in the event that one cuts down a tree, they would invite curses not just for themselves only but also the generations to come. This therefore meant that people exercised utmost discipline in resource utilization. Trees also acted as shelters i.e as a house and also provided camouflage and a hiding place and a safe refuge when enemies attack and also during the rainy seasons.
Such a strict traditional governance system therefore ensured that much of the remnants of truly indigenous trees in Kenya were protected and this can be spotted in areas still occupied by the indigenous communities. Of late however, the situation is gradually changing partly as a result of politics that has seen the large-scale eviction of the indigenous communities from their ancestral lands in the name of creating conservation areas and also resettlement programs in an aim to rehabilitate the degraded lands. Instead, what has happened is that another door of corruption has been opened, where timber merchants obtain dubious licences for harvesting indigenous trees-mainly hardwood-considered to be of high quality. Huge blocks of forested areas covered by indigenous trees-which really take many years to mature-and also form catchment areas for many rivers and streams supplying water to urban centers around and far away have been cleared.
Efforts to replace the indigenous trees with exotic trees hasn't born much fruit since most of these exotics are not well adaptable to the surrounding environment. Further, the fact that many of them mature faster, means that we are trapped on a zero sum game with no significant increase in the forest cover. These trees are toxic in nature, restricting undergrowth which means they are not good for rehabilitating an ecosystem which hosts a variety of flora and fauna that are interdependent.
One of the rivers emanating from
Cherangany Hills-a key catchment area
for many rivers in the Rift Valley, Kenya.
|
Indigenous communities and indigenous knowledge has therefore come to play a very central role in the efforts to reduce the impacts of climate change and global warming. To this far, challenges still abound both from internal and external sources with the former mainly emanating from the government while the latter is mainly due to a change in lifestyle and modernization among people, which means that people have been forced to adopt modern lifestyles hence abandoning their traditional social and economic systems of living for modern and "fancy" ones which are capitalistic in nature. This has therefore broken that critical societal fabric guided by customs and traditions governance system, meaning that people begin to live individual lives and start demanding modern sources of energy and foodstuffs etc which require money to sustain them. This has forced many to turn to forest and its products for sustenance. The result has been and sadly so that, people who ought to protect these forests, have turned in to loggers themselves all in an attempt to eke out a living.